Gracy’s piece (Gracy, Karen. Film Preservation: Competing definitions of value, use, and practice. Chicago: Society of American Archivists. 2006. Chp. 8) is really interesting from our perspective as students in the Ischool, because it really examines the work that a film archivist actually does, from inspecting the film, to negotiating with labs, to selecting what can be saved. It would be helpful to study many different types of positions in this field (libraries, archives, digitization), since professionally there are so many different kinds of positions and kinds of work to be done, and this type of anthropological writing, examining the work that people do, is so rare. We read a chapter of Gracy’s work in Caroline Frick’s Politics of Preservation course last year. It reminded me of readings that I did in Doty’s Users course about studying the way that people work and the way that people share information and gain knowledge on the job, primarily through gaining experience and watching other ‘experts’ in the field (The Social Life of Information, Brown and Duguid). This is why interviewing people, and working on case studies of archives and other institutions can be so helpful for students, because people on the job can succinctly sum up what the main issues are within the field.
For me, the most interesting aspects were the political discussions about deciding which films should be saved. This is something that a digital preservationist really decides, and there is never a right answer.
Friday, November 14, 2008
Friday, November 7, 2008
Viewing two digitized film collections
I looked at two archives online (note: It seemed that The University of Maryland site’s videos were not accessible to people outside of the University of Maryland).
The first site I looked at was the Internet Archive (archive.org), which has a lot of interesting films to watch. I had been on this site before. Anyone can upload videos here. Collections are subdivided into subject categories, or people can just use a keyword search. I first looked in the “Cultural and Academic Films” category, and found the University of Pennsylvania’s Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology collection, which includes a collection of digitized 16mm films made by Watson Kintner, during his travels around the world from 1933 to 1969. I watched “1967 #12 Tunisia.”
It is available in downloadable MPEG 1, MPEG 2, MPEG 4 and Streaming formats. Like most films on the Internet Archive site, the work is not formally cataloged, just tagged with a few words. It also includes a shot list though, and reel numbers. This must have all been compiled originally at the University of Pennsylvania and uploaded by them.
When “full screen” it looks bad, there is lots of blocky data. When it is not blown up, it doesn’t look so bad. It’s silent and in color. The color looks beautiful to me, though maybe it is a little faded.
The first site I looked at was the Internet Archive (archive.org), which has a lot of interesting films to watch. I had been on this site before. Anyone can upload videos here. Collections are subdivided into subject categories, or people can just use a keyword search. I first looked in the “Cultural and Academic Films” category, and found the University of Pennsylvania’s Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology collection, which includes a collection of digitized 16mm films made by Watson Kintner, during his travels around the world from 1933 to 1969. I watched “1967 #12 Tunisia.”
It is available in downloadable MPEG 1, MPEG 2, MPEG 4 and Streaming formats. Like most films on the Internet Archive site, the work is not formally cataloged, just tagged with a few words. It also includes a shot list though, and reel numbers. This must have all been compiled originally at the University of Pennsylvania and uploaded by them.
When “full screen” it looks bad, there is lots of blocky data. When it is not blown up, it doesn’t look so bad. It’s silent and in color. The color looks beautiful to me, though maybe it is a little faded.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)